> At 02:06 PM 2/18/98 -0500, Paul Prestopnik wrote:
>
> >Initialy I was not sure whether to believe Richard or not, and I fully
> expected
> >to see a rebuttal from BLR. Because this rebuttal never occured, (In fact
> BLR
> >has not said anything about Brodie's stament) I am much more inclined to
> >believe Richard.
>
> That's not the only possible explanation for BLR's silence on the issue.
damn, the minute I sent that last one, I thought of a much better reason.
Since Brodie said that he would continue to write as Brett, Brett not
responding would show that Brodie was not Brett. Of course, Brett did
eventually respond. hmm.