Paul Prestopnik wrote:
> David McFadzean wrote:
>
> > At 02:06 PM 2/18/98 -0500, Paul Prestopnik wrote:
> >
> > >Initialy I was not sure whether to believe Richard or not, and I fully
> > expected
> > >to see a rebuttal from BLR. Because this rebuttal never occured, (In fact
> > BLR
> > >has not said anything about Brodie's stament) I am much more inclined to
> > >believe Richard.
> >
> > That's not the only possible explanation for BLR's silence on the issue.
>
> damn, the minute I sent that last one, I thought of a much better reason.
> Since Brodie said that he would continue to write as Brett, Brett not
> responding would show that Brodie was not Brett. Of course, Brett did
> eventually respond. hmm.