>I think we may be talking about two kinds of beliefs here:
>prescriptive and descriptive. The former are the kind that cause
>behavior, the latter kind explains behavior. We can't help but
>have descriptive beliefs; if one doesn't go to church then one
>is acting as if one doesn't believe in God, whether agnostic
>or atheist, there is no effective difference at that level.
Not sure I understand the above (so I act due to a prescriptive belief, but
why would I need another descriptive belief to explain my own behavior? Or
is it other people who are going to use a descriptive belief to explain my
behavior?). I'm also not seeing the relevance of this distinction to the
so-called "axiomatic" beliefs I alluded to when mentioning the "getting out
of bed" example. Would you mind clarifying?
>Godel's theorem actually only applies to formal systems.
The logic upon which we base our rationality is a formal system. Of
course, many of our beliefs and conclusions also have strong empirical
component. Other axiomatic memes are involved here: <my sense perceptions
are mostly trustworthy>, etc.
lena
-
Lena Rotenberg
lenar@hermesnet.net