>I'm with you, but you've got to admit the fundamental problem with
>belief systems is why *they* can't see *your* point. Atheists can't see
>
>why theists believe in God, theists can't see why atheists refute God,
>Brodie can't see why people don't appreciate the three levels, Wade
>can't see why people don't recognize it's just parlor-talk ....
On the contrary, I was very specific about why people don't appreciate
the three levels. It's because they're in Level 2.
>
>What's to differentiate memetics from everything else that's refutable?
>
>Perhaps it's one of the few tools to recognize itself for what it is :
>a
>tool.
Good point, but I would assert that all science falls into that
category.
>Richard Brodie RBrodie@brodietech.com +1.206.688.8600
>CEO, Brodie Technology Group, Inc., Bellevue, WA, USA
>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie
>Do you know what a "meme" is?
>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm
>