From: Michelle Anderson (michelle@barrymenasherealtors.com)
Date: Fri Jan 23 2004 - 12:43:13 MST
[Jei] Anyways, I don't see why anyone would prefer being dominated
to being the dominator in a relationship. - In western societies women
are wanted. - They are free and get to do the choice. - Men on the other
hand are more or less forced to compete for them (unless they're in the
top 5% hunks or so.) -> Hence they can be dominated or dumped in western
societies. - In less civilized places women really need the men, hence
they take care of them.
Only when women begin to feel insecure in their chances of securing a
man, will they submit to being dominated in western societies. I can see
many advantages in non-american women. - Although it may be a matter of
pride for some to dominate an american woman,
- however real that domination then actually is, is another matter.
Speaking in crude generalities, of course, and naturally assuming that
we all wish to rule our world.
[Michelle] What about not dominating or be dominated but having an equal
partnership? In my relationship, we each give lip service to the
other's superficial needs to be perceived as dominant - ie, he does the
car stuff, the heavy lifting, etc., even though I'm quite capable, and I
do the kitchen stuff, the cleaning, the nurturing, even though he's
quite capable, and we enjoy this little game we play - but then when it
comes down to anything of importance, we are utter equals and bow to
each other's areas of expertise and experience. It IS possible...
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 23 2004 - 12:43:45 MST