On 15 Sep 2002 at 0:36, Dr Sebby wrote:
> ...dont you also have to consider that perhaps we HAVE to risk a
> terrorist nuclear attack? once such a thing occurs, it might serve as
> a catalyst for rapid transformation regarding international
> regulations on weapons development and arms dealing. as things
> currently stand, out of one side of big government's mouth is concern
> for the people and peace and safety etc. and out of the other comes
> all the big money deals with whichever nasty entity is offering enough
> $ to buy their next election in return for 'devil-may-care' policy
> changes and favorable legislation etc. which result in half the
> "terrible problems" which plague those little people they claim to
> care about. the snake eats it's own tail and uses the nutrition to
> grow a longer tail. we are definitely approaching a significant cusp
> in human history at this time...the age of massive individual
> empowerment - which our society isnt ready for by any means..and yet,
> here it comes - nukes arent sold at the drugstore just yet, but such a
> notion is where we are heading...and without the time to rectify the
> vast stupidity which we've been encouraging for all these years in our
> cheap attempts to satiate our greeds and needs - now the debt will
> start to be paid back.
>
I am hopeful that we can forfend the US suffering a nuclear attack on a
US city by terror states or forces; however, if we DO suffer such an
attack, the world will undoubtedly reap the US whirlwind. I do not want
to see that happen, for the sake of the world's environment and people.
>
> drsebby.
>
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: RIGHTSBOY@aol.com
> Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: Re: virus: President Bush's UN Speech: Full Text
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:35:25 EDT
>
> >>>... The bomb components could be shipped
> separately, and the device assembled onsite.
> We just cannot risk it.<<<<
>
> Good point! We all (i.e. every person of every nation, including ours
> -- and yes, even Israel) need to formally recognize that we are living
> in one 'world' now, thanks to rapid global transportation and
> communications technologies, and we all need to submit to our common,
> democratically instituted policing authority when it comes to
> verification of our compliance with our United Nations and other
> contractual (read Geneva Convention, etc.) agreements and obligations
> to each other. If Saddam chooses not to accept our common
> predicament, and comply with our common requirements, then he has to
> be removed from his office as the executive leader of a nation.
>
>
>
>
> DrSebby.
> "Courage...and shuffle the cards".
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________ Send
> and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:23 MDT