joedees@bellsouth.net
Sent: 12 September 2002 11:48 PM
On 12 Sep 2002 at 11:35, Archibald Scatflinger wrote:
> [joe]
> > To oppose an action against those who had engineered the deaths of
> > three thousand of mostly American civilian citizens in her largest
> > city, and who had pledged to perpetrate more of the same, is itself
> > anti- american.
[Blunderov]
This doesn't seem logical. How is opposing such an action in and of
itself anti-American? The opposer might quite easily have what they
consider to be Americas best interests at heart; they might be a patriot
of note. Or not.
The question is entirely moot.
Warm regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:23 MDT