On 12 Sep 2002 at 11:35, Archibald Scatflinger wrote:
>
>
> [joe]
> > To oppose an action against those who had engineered the deaths of
> > three thousand of mostly American civilian citizens in her largest
> > city, and who had pledged to perpetrate more of the same, is itself
> > anti- american.
> [archibald]
>
> In your opinion(which you bought from your local news program)the
> attacks were caused by muslims who hate America. In my opinion the
> attacks were caused by greedy elitists trying to scare the world
> population into fighting with each other so they can profit by selling
> weapons to both sides and then eventually gain total control. Most of
> these elitist's seem to be working very closely with the American
> government in my opinion. I agree that > To oppose an action against
> those who had engineered the deaths of > three thousand of mostly
> American civilian citizens in her largest city, > and who had pledged
> to perpetrate more of the same, is itself anti- > american.
>
Also in Bin Ladin's fucking opinion. Remember him? He's the
cocksucker who was behind the attacks, and we have his ass on video
saying, in effect, "Yay! We did good!"
But, of course, you would never let something as inconsequential as a
bare bones fact interfere with your pre-packaged opinion, now would
you?
>
> But in my opinion this makes you the Anti-American.
>
No, it makes you the memebotically infested conspiracy-nut anti-
american zombie.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:23 MDT