On 27 Jul 2002 at 23:09, Dr Sebby wrote:
>
> ...this has always been true. and when considering punishments, we must
> always consider the innocents within our prison system...oh, they ARE there!
> and im sure a few child rape cases to boot...angry ex-wife...brainwashing
> little jonny to point and agree.....etc. there is nothing more disturbing
> than the thought of a totally innocent man sitting in prison for years
> waiting for his execution - talk about angst!
>
> drsebby.
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "David McFadzean" <david@lucifer.com>
> Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
> To: <virus@lucifer.com>
> Subject: Re: virus: OZ
> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:26:06 -0600
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
>
> > I bring up the presently actually guilty (via DNA and other evidence),
> > and you counter with the innocent, as Hermit counters with the possibly
> > future transgressors.
>
> I didn't "counter" with anything, my question was an honest one.
>
> Do you disagree with my stated assumption that any conceivable practical
> justice system will necessarily make some errors and convict the innocent?
> If so, on what grounds?
>
No, but do you disagree with my statement that unless convicted
murderers are removed from civil society, that many more innocents
would die a their hands than would be accidentally executed under our
civil justice system?
>
>
> DrSebby.
> "Courage...and shuffle the cards".
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:16 MDT