> Hi virions!
>
> Just for the record, I'm convinced that it's Brodie who is deluded and
> deluding us here -- it's his lies which are confusing us.
>
> Brett's homepage is very large -- and Brett also began posting a long time
> ago (his first post was on June 26/97, see
> http://www.lucifer.com/virus/virus.97/4497.html )
>
> If Richard = Brett then certainly Richard has spent far more time on this
> "experiment" than it deserved. His *real* experiment, I believe, is
> happening right now, in watching how we treat both Brett and himself. I for
> one intend to do exactly as before -- although perhaps I'll take what
> Richard says with a *larger* grain of salt.
>
> Additionally, I'd like to see a realization from Brett that it is his own
> mostly incomphensable posts which even allow Richard's silliness to have
> any effect.
>
> ERiC
How do I know that you are not Richard? :)
Initialy I was not sure whether to believe Richard or not, and I fully expected
to see a rebuttal from BLR. Because this rebuttal never occured, (In fact BLR
has not said anything about Brodie's stament) I am much more inclined to
believe Richard. Also regarding Richard's disapointment. I seem to recall a
post by Brett in which he stated that he felt his posts were being ignored.
That acknowledgement contradicts Brodie's saying we were hornswaggled.
-Paul Prestopnik