> Suggestion:  Do not label the "mind" as level 3.  Rather, label the 
> "thought process".  Thought processes are much easier to talk about 
> than are "minds".  At best then, if one still wants to label the 
> "mind," say that it "is a mind capable of entertaining level 3 
> thoughts," (even though it might not always be doing so).
Try classifying the level-n of a mind by the default thought mode: If X 
is completely suprised, what mode does he think in?
> I like to think that I'm quite capable of operating in "level 3 mode," 
> only I find the day-to-day assessment of various factual information 
> much easier to accomplish if I'm in "level 2 cruise control".  (This 
> is, in fact, a level 3 argument: I find it more "useful" to grind 
> away in level 2 most of the time - just personal taste: it's much 
> easier to arrive at the 'truth' for me.  If a discussion requires 
> me to utilize level 3 thinking, then I will - no problem.
> 
> Examples:
> 1) Someone tells me that the Yankees beat the Braves in game 5, even 
> though Smoltz and Wohlers combined to pitch a 0.00 ERA for the game.  
> I say: "How strange!  Is this true?"  Then I watch the news, (a 'truth' 
> authority (haha)), and find out that indeed, it is 'true', at which 
> point I grumble about the Braves losing game 5.  That is "level 2 
> cruise control": find out what is true and be done with it. Level 3, 
> on the other hand, (and as I understand it), would approach this along 
> these lines: it doesn't care what is 'true', rather focuses on what is 
> 'useful,' - In level 3, I would note all the seeming "facts," and then 
> decide to accept the lesser of two evils: the non-fulfillment of my 
> personal desire to see things as others seem to see things; or the 
> non-fulfillment of my personal desire to see the Braves win.  I choose 
> that the lesser of the two evils is to accept this so-called "fact" 
> that the Braves lost, and then behave in such a way that I feel will 
> benefit me the most, (or do me the least harm): I grumble about the 
> Braves losing game 5.
> Clearly, level 2 mode is easier to run in here.
Level-2 is a simpler default than level-3: but the default is usually the 
simplest mode, barring extreme computational difficulties.  Which do not 
seem to be described above.
Actually, part of level-3 seems to work by explicitly programming level-2 
responses.
[CLIP]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/   Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/   Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////