Hermit
Archon
Posts: 4289
Reputation: 8.50
Rate Hermit
Prime example of a practically perfect person
 
|
 |
Q.When is a holocaust not a holocaust? A.When the perpetrators call it a victory
« on: 2008-10-05 02:16:07 » |
 |
The Surge and the Stench of "Victory"
When is a Holocaust Not a Holocaust?
Source: Counterpunch
Authors: William Blum
Dated: 2008-10-05
William Blum is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II, Rogue State: a guide to the World's Only Super Power. and West-Bloc Dissident: a Cold War Political Memoir.
When is a holocaust not a holocaust?
When the perpetrators call it a victory.
Although the "surge" has failed as policy, it appears to be succeeding as propaganda. It seems to be the only thing that supporters of the war have to point to, and so they point, and they point, and they point. Allow me to point out that while there has been a reduction in violence in Iraq -- now down to a level that virtually any other society in the world would find horrible and intolerable, including Iraqi society before the US invasion and occupation -- we must keep in mind that thanks to this lovely little war more than half the population of Iraq is either dead, crippled, traumatized, confined in overflowing American and Iraqi prisons, internally displaced, or in foreign exile.
Thus, the number of people available for being killers or victims is markedly reduced. Moreover, extensive ethnic cleansing has taken place in the country (another good indication of progress, n'est-ce pas?). Sunnis and Shiites are now living more in their own special enclaves than before [ Hermit : See Church of Virus BBS, General, Serious Business, Contra Troll, satellite images prove ethnic cleansing reduced strife in Iraq which provides the satellite imagery and analysis substantiating that apartheid-like segregation, rather than the "surge," resulted in the reduction of violence in Iraq to merely horrible levels. ] , none of those stinking mixed communities with their unholy mixed marriages, so violence of the sectarian type has also gone down; and the powerful movement of Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr has had a cease-fire in effect for many months, unconnected to the surge. On top of all this, US soldiers, in the face of numerous "improvised explosive devices" on the roads, have been venturing out a lot less (for fear of things like ... well, dying), so the violence against our noble lads is also down. Remember that insurgent attacks on American forces is how the Iraqi violence all began in the first place. [ Hermit : Remembering that an insurgent is a person who opposes a legitimate government - and multiple conventions and treaties to whioch the USA is a signatory (and thus they, together with the US constitution for the supreme law of the land, prohibit a change of government under occupation. Which strongly suggests that the people using the word "insurgent" to describe the guerrillas opposed to the government in Iraq are, at the least, using the word incautiously. ]
Just imagine -- If the entire Iraqi population over the age of 10 is killed, disabled, imprisoned or forced into exile there will probably be no violence at all. Now that would really be victory.
mNo American should be allowed to forget that Iraqi society has been destroyed. The people of that unhappy land have lost everything -- their homes, their schools, their neighborhoods, their mosques, their jobs, their careers, their professionals, their health care, their legal system, their women's rights, their religious tolerance, their security, their past, their present, their future, their lives. But they do have their surge.
|
With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. - Steven Weinberg, 1999
|
|
|
Author
Logged
