a published novelist, our neo convict...apparently its full of fun...as befits a conservative politician...its got incest, paedophilia, beastility and scatological....
The narrative makes generous mention of lice, snot, drunkenness, bad breath, torture, urine, “turds,” armpits, arm hair, neck hair, pubic hair, pus, boils, and blood (regular and menstrual). One passage goes, “At length he walked around to the deer’s head and, reaching into his pants, struggled for a moment and then pulled out his penis. He began to piss in the snow just in front of the deer’s nostrils.”
Homoeroticism and incest also figure as themes. The main female character, Yukiko, draws hair on the “mound” of a little girl. The brothers of a dead samurai have sex with his daughter. Many things glisten (mouths, hair, evergreens), quiver (a “pink underlip,” arm muscles, legs), and are sniffed (floorboards, sheets, fingers). The cast includes a dwarf, and an “assistant headman” who comes to restore order after a crime at the inn. (Might this character be autobiographical? And, if so, would that have made Libby the assistant headman or the assistant headman’s assistant?)
When it comes to depicting scenes of romance, however, Libby can evoke a sort of musty sweetness; while one critic deemed “The Apprentice” “reminiscent of Rembrandt,” certain passages can better be described as reminiscent of Penthouse Forum. There is, for example, Yukiko’s seduction of the inexperienced apprentice:
He could feel her heart beneath his hands. He moved his hands slowly lower still and she arched her back to help him and her lower leg came against his. He held her breasts in his hands. Oddly, he thought, the lower one might be larger. . . . One of her breasts now hung loosely in his hand near his face and he knew not how best to touch her.
Other sex scenes are less conventional. Where his Republican predecessors can seem embarrassingly awkward—the written equivalent of trying to cop a feel while pinning on a corsage—Libby is unabashed:
At age ten the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest.
<snip> Bear Market: Price of Scooter Libby's Novel Soars at Amazon
By E&P Staff
Published: November 06, 2005 6:00 PM ET
NEW YORK Who says alleged crime doesn’t pay? I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby may or may not get a nice book sale out of his upcoming trial, but owners of out-pf-print or autographed versions of his sole novel, “The Apprentice,” are looking to make a bungle right now.
Since the book, which is set in Japan and features some bizarre sex practices, is out of print, amazon.com is not selling it via the usual channels, but instead offering it for sale from individuals. They are peddling copies for $119 and up for the paperback (published in 2002), to a minimum of $745 for the hardback (from 1996).
One seller, with the apt name “Ameribiz,” seeks $2400 for an edition he describes this way: “Inscribed, mint, PRE-FIRST EDITION. The bound 1996 uncorrected page proofs in Brand New MINT condition with inscription handwritten by Libby, himself. Inscription reads: 'To Bob. I hope you enjoy it. Lewis Libby.' A perfect gift for the ‘Bob’ who has everything.”
Let speculation begin on who the original Bob might be. Novak? Woodward?
A seller at barnesandnoble.com, named "Igor," wants $1039 for his copy of the hardback editon.
One recent citizen-reviewer at Amazon wrote: “I paid $4 plus surface-mail shipping, but the price has skyrocketed since Libby was indicted on five counts by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, and resigned from Vice President Cheney's office. Gee, lucky me.”
Another called "The Apprentice" a “solid book. I thoroughly enjoyed Libby's first novel. Now that he's out of politics (unfortunately) I hope he continues to write!”
The Libby book conjures a young Japanese man who runs a remote mountain inn and becomes trapped in intrigue. The book includes incest, a hunter who wonders if he should shag a freshly killed deer while it's still warm, and a girl kept in a cage and raped by a bear to train her to become a prostitute.
Another review excerpt: “This otherwise played-out story had bear rape. As a bear raper I can say that the idea of turning the tables was quite erotic. But then there was no more animal rape… what’s up with that?”
And one more: “It's probably not fair to rate Scooter's masterpiece without reading it first. It's on my to-do list, after reading his forthcoming book, rumored to be titled ‘Diary of a Jailhouse Snitch.’"</snip>
Have you ever watched a movie trailer that's amusing, but which also leaves you with the sense that you've just seen all the good parts? Think of what you're reading now as the same sort of thing, except that it covers the bad parts of A Time To Run, the new novel by Barbara Boxer, the liberal Democratic senator from California.
Of course, saying that A Time To Run has a few bad parts really doesn't give Boxer enough credit — the whole book is stupendously awful, from the first page to the last. As a service to you, dear reader, I have slogged my way through it, in order to share with you the worst of the worst.
You don't need to know much about the characters or the plot, except that the central figure is a liberal Democratic senator from California (sound familiar?) who must decide how she is going to respond to a Republican Supreme Court nomination. And thus, on the opening pages of A Time To Run, we encounter Boxer's utter lack of imagination:
It had been a particularly intense day in [Senator Ellen Fischer's] D.C. office, with a steady stream of meetings, e-mails, and phone calls from organizations and constituents, all urging her to step up her opposition to Professor Frida Hernandez's nomination to the Supreme Court. There was little time left for any attempt to block the confirmation of the ultra-conservative professor. ... Ellen, a member of the [Judiciary] committee, had sought to challenge the nominee's strongly suspected bias against Roe v. Wade. ... Ellen knew that, once on the Court, Hernandez would help turn back the clock on Court decisions that Ellen believed were vital to the people.
Ultra-conservative? Turn back the clock? Vital to the people? It sounds like a talking-points memo distributed by the DNC, a form of literature that is arguably a sub-genre of fiction. Alas, A Time To Run really is a novel, and before long Boxer describes not only her protagonist's liberal purity but also her good-hearted motives:
That was a defining moment, when Ellen knew how she'd spend the rest of her life — that she'd been put here on earth to save its endangered children.
Writing authentic dialogue can be a challenge for even the best authors. Boxer, however, mangles the language in unprecedented ways. In a scene set in 1974, a character who is a student at UC-Berkeley declares:
"She's out pounding the pavement doing good works while you just hang out at home dissing the President."
Question: During the Nixon era, did anybody speak of "dissing" the president?
Here's more motivational blather that manages to combine cliché ("close to her heart") with liberal pablum (a "forum" for discussing "street problems"), in a paragraph that climaxes with a bit of dialogue that is at once dreadful in its own right and entirely typical of A Time To Run:
Town Hall for Kids was a project close to her heart, a planned forum in which young people might meet both with her and with selected public officials to discuss, in safe and neutral surroundings, not just the street problems confronting them every day, such as drugs, gangs, and the proliferation of guns, but ideas on how to make their town a better place to live. "Talk to us!" she'd urge. "Work with us and get involved. Let's find solutions together!"
And now, for the dirty bits — the sex scenes! Yes, Senator Boxer has written a few, and not all of them involve humans.
Sex scene #1. It's between people.
Greg's naked body was long and elegant, his embrace enveloped her utterly, and they meshed with ease and grace. He smelled good too, faintly and astringently of aftershave. He was clinging to her as if he'd never let her go, it was all so easy and right.
Sex scene #2. It's between people as well, and once again they "mesh."
The bed was huge and soft with a blue and white comforter. He didn't notice Jane taking her clothes off but suddenly she was naked: long legged, lithe, and bronzed. The sheets were cool, her body warm, her limbs strong and supple, and they meshed with his just as he remembered. "Oh Greg, dearheart," she whispered in his ear, "I've missed you so. Welcome home."
Sex scene #3. Okay, okay, it isn't really about sex. It's about lust. But it's extraordinarily weird. Kneecaps?
Her skirt was very short, and Josh found himself mesmerized by her perfectly shaped, silken legs with kneecaps that reminded him of golden apples — he couldn't remember having been captivated by knees before — and her lustrous thighs. He tore his eyes away from Bianca's legs with the utmost difficulty.
Sex scene #4. It's between horses. No kidding. No "meshing." (And the first sentence is side-splittingly ungrammatical.)
A ton of finely tuned muscle, hide glistening, the crest of his mane risen in full sexual display, and his neck curved in an exaggerated arch that reminded Greg of a horse he'd seen in an old tapestry in some castle in Europe Jane had dragged him to. The stallion approached, nostrils flared, hooves lifting with delicate precision, the wranglers hanging on grimly. ... The stallion rubbed his nose against the mare's neck and nuzzled her withers. She promptly bit him on the shoulder and, when he attempted to mount, instantly became a plunging devil of teeth and hooves. ... Greg clutched the rails with white knuckles, wondering, as these two fierce animals were coerced into the majestic coupling by at least six people, how foals ever got born in the wild.
In a note at the front of the book, Boxer says that she wrote A Time To Run to describe "the true world of politics in all its glory and all of its ugliness." Even this sentence is a bad one: The phrasing should be either "all of its glory and all of its ugliness" or "all its glory and all its ugliness."
One thing's for sure: Boxer has the ugliness part down pat.
"We think in generalities, we live in details"
Re:libby, the novelist
« Reply #3 on: 2005-11-18 01:24:51 »
[Blunderov] One has to wonder what Boxer's novel has to do with the subject of this thread but no matter; we are all used to this kindergarten petulance by now.
There are two schools of thought about honesty in novel wrtiting. One school holds that the author should write only about what she knows from her own experience; an autobiographical approach. The other school of thought holds that she should write exclusively from her own imagination.
Whichever it is to which Libby has subscribed, neither commends him.
"We think in generalities, we live in details"
Re:libby, the novelist
« Reply #6 on: 2005-11-18 08:58:13 »
[Salamantis] "I just trying to show that no political party or ideology has a monopoly on bad and raunchy writing..."
[Blunderov] But why? The Mermaid's rhetoric did not go nearly as far as suggesting that this was the case. If it is happens to be true that all neoconfidence tricksters must necessarily be bad writers due to weakness of intellect, it does not follow that all bad writers must be criminals as well.
Why do you seem to feel compelled to rush to the defence of these palookas at every slight whether real or imagined? How is it possible to conclude that you are anything other than a memebot?
[Salamantis] "I just trying to show that no political party or ideology has a monopoly on bad and raunchy writing..."
[Blunderov] But why? The Mermaid's rhetoric did not go nearly as far as suggesting that this was the case. If it is happens to be true that all neoconfidence tricksters must necessarily be bad writers due to weakness of intellect, it does not follow that all bad writers must be criminals as well.
Why do you seem to feel compelled to rush to the defence of these palookas at every slight whether real or imagined? How is it possible to conclude that you are anything other than a memebot?
blunderov, you are trying to understand why joe "salamantis" dees is comparing boxer's description of two breeding horses mate and libby's narrator bit about fucking a still warm dead deer?
i am not even going to venture into ten year old girls were caged with sexually raunchy bears that were 'trained to couple' with female children. imagination and fantasies are personal...conservative values not withstanding. but when it gets published, everything is fair game.
I don't know whether Boxer's book is any good, but I can say a couple of things about the review.
Besides the questionable relevance to the topic of the discussion, which has been pointed out by others, I have to say that the reviewer displayed a serious difficulty in comprehending long sentences, a definite opinion that proper school grammar should be preferred over literary devices, and a tendency for easy cracks.
I bet I can do a better job of dissing a book by, say, Charles Dickens, if I look hard enough. Although I'll admit that the "Heh... 'mesh', she said 'mesh'... look here... 'mesh' again" trick should give an easy giggle to the schoolboys. The "Look here, there's sex... horse sex even" trick should fare well too.
In short, this review is a rather weak piece of work.
Posting volumes of reviews and articles published somewhere does not mean anything. The point has yet to be made for each individual article.