Author
|
Topic: TOTD (Read 811 times) |
|
David Lucifer
Archon     
Posts: 2642 Reputation: 8.53 Rate David Lucifer

Enlighten me.
|
 |
TOTD
« on: 2004-05-24 13:08:29 » |
|
The happiness gained from a false belief is a fool's prize.
|
|
|
|
simul
Adept    
Gender: 
Posts: 614 Reputation: 7.13 Rate simul

I am a lama.

|
 |
Re: virus: TOTD
« Reply #1 on: 2004-05-25 11:35:51 » |
|
Happiness is gained from being in the present moment, without need for memes of faith or fear. --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
|
|
|
rhinoceros
Archon     
Gender: 
Posts: 1318 Reputation: 8.02 Rate rhinoceros

My point is ...
|
 |
Re:TOTD
« Reply #2 on: 2004-05-25 16:04:50 » |
|
[Lucifer] The happiness gained from a false belief is a fool's prize.
[rhinoceros] 1. What is happiness? I understand happiness as a set of states of the mind (-brain). It may contain pleasure but this is not necessary. I think happiness is being satisfied with your condition by some measures of your own, while you are aware of the possibility of a number of other less desirable conditions (hence "ignorance is bliss" -- when you can not see anything better than your current condition).
2. What is a false belief? To recognize one you have to find that it produces contradictions in the context of a belief system which is both self-consistent and consistent with all facts thrown at it so far. If you take a wider view, you may also include meaningless spurious beliefs which have no direct consequences at all (these may have indirect consequences though).
An interesting question is whether "false belief" as used in the TOTD should include beliefs which cannot be falsified by someone but can be falsified by someone else at another time and place.
What do you think of spurious beliefs which you consciously enforce on yourself so that you get the benefits of happiness in a limited context? Something like a fantasy game.
3. What is a fool's prize? This I don't know. Anyone?
|
|
|
|
rhinoceros
Archon     
Gender: 
Posts: 1318 Reputation: 8.02 Rate rhinoceros

My point is ...
|
 |
Re:TOTD
« Reply #3 on: 2004-05-29 20:38:27 » |
|
New thought of the day on local evation of memetic selection.
If I can talk with resolve while the audience is covering me with tar and feathers, it is impossible my memes to be selected out at that location.
|
|
|
|
MoEnzyme
Initiate     
Gender: 
Posts: 2256 Reputation: 5.49 Rate MoEnzyme

infidel lab animal
|
 |
RE: virus: Re:TOTD
« Reply #4 on: 2004-05-30 16:12:18 » |
|
Interesting thought. I would paraphrase it this way. We like to cheer for the underdog, and if they are at odds, confidence (or the appearance of it) trumps reason.
Of course through repeated transmissions, the underdog status of the advocate as well as his/her apparent confidence get separated from the memes, at which point they become easier to reject. However, at the point of origin we tend to respond more to the personality than the ideas.
I wouldn't go so far as to say its impossible to reject the memes at their source . . . If I am effectively designated as one of "them" to the target audience then my memes will probably hardly register, at which point tarring and feathering me probably just adds to this social separation from the audience regardless of my advocacy. For example, if I walked into a group of Southern Baptists, and I were revealed to be a godless baby-killer (that's their view of liberal democrats), then it really wouldn't matter what I had to say or how well I held my ground about some other subject (like the wrongness of our invasion of Iraq, etc.), I'm still a godless baby-killer to them.
However, given nothing else, I would say it is difficult enough to reject the memes of a skilled advocate at the point of origin.
-Jake
> [Original Message] > From: rhinoceros <rhinoceros@freemail.gr> > To: <virus@lucifer.com> > Date: 05/29/2004 5:38:27 PM > Subject: virus: Re:TOTD > > > New thought of the day on local evation of memetic selection. > > If I can talk with resolve while the audience is covering me with tar and feathers, it is impossible my memes to be selected out at that location. > > > ---- > This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2004 board on Church of Virus BBS. > <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=61;action=display;threadid=303 57> > --- > To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
--- Jake Sapiens --- every1hz@earthlink.net --- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
I will fight your gods for food, Mo Enzyme
 (consolidation of handles: Jake Sapiens; memelab; logicnazi; Loki; Every1Hz; and Shadow)
|
|
|
rhinoceros
Archon     
Gender: 
Posts: 1318 Reputation: 8.02 Rate rhinoceros

My point is ...
|
 |
Re: virus: Re:TOTD
« Reply #5 on: 2004-05-30 14:02:29 » |
|
[Jake Sapiens] <snip>For example, if I walked into a group of Southern Baptists, and I were revealed to be a godless baby-killer (that's their view of liberal democrats), then it really wouldn't matter what I had to say or how well I held my ground about some other subject (like the wrongness of our invasion of Iraq, etc.), I'm still a godless baby-killer to them.
However, given nothing else, I would say it is difficult enough to reject the memes of a skilled advocate at the point of origin.
[rhinoceros] What is funny is that if you can keep it up for ever, oblivious to the tar and feathers, and there is nothing else they can do, they might come to like it eventually.
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
|
|
|
simul
Adept    
Gender: 
Posts: 614 Reputation: 7.13 Rate simul

I am a lama.

|
 |
Re: virus: Re:TOTD
« Reply #6 on: 2004-05-31 11:56:50 » |
|
: transmissions, the underdog : status of the : advocate as well as his/her : apparent confidence get : separated from the : memes, at which point they : become easier to reject.
I agree. This necessitates a two-phase transmission. Not only must the meme be transmitted, but also the recipient must be sufficiently trained to retransmit.
Formal classes can be designed to train virian memetic ability.
Have any of you ever taken an improvisational comedy course? These are excellent for building memetic ability in a group.
I would really like to take one with a dozen other Virians. Perhaps I can arrange something in Vegas? --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
|
First, read Bruce Sterling's "Distraction", and then read http://electionmethods.org.
|
|
|
rhinoceros
Archon     
Gender: 
Posts: 1318 Reputation: 8.02 Rate rhinoceros

My point is ...
|
 |
Re:TOTD
« Reply #7 on: 2004-06-04 04:56:39 » |
|
Yet another thought of the day
No haggling, no whining, work with provisional absolutes, use second-guessing to fast-forward, give freely and take whatever is freely offered.
Does any of this help you win? Well, no. In fact it seems to be evolutionarily unviable most of the time, but *if* it works it is very rewarding and if it doesn't, heck, you didn't expect it to anyway.

|
|
|
|
|