> ... was not really the address from which they were sent from.
One too many from, here=85 The superfluous preposition meme strikes =
again!
On Tuesday, Sep 2, 2003, at 19:03 Europe/London, rhinoceros wrote:
>
> [Blunderov]
> I have been getting a lot of mail returned to me as undeliverable. The =
=20
> trouble is I never sent out the mail which is being returned to me. =20=
> Some mail is entitled 'that movie', a title which I have never used, =20=
> some is entitled 'my details' which IS a title I have used sometimes =20=
> in my former scambaiting activities.
>
> <snip>
>
>
> [rhinoceros]
> No need to worry, Blunderov. We all receive them these days.
>
> Someone who had your e-mail address in their address book was infected =
=20
> by a virus. Then the virus started sending out infected e-mails to =20
> addresses it found there, using your own address, which was also found =
=20
> there, as a return address ("From:") .
>
> Some of these emails were sent to addresses which were no longer =20
> valid. So, those messages were "returned" to you as undelivered, =20
> because they appeared as sent by you.
>
> And don't worry about looking bad. One can easily see in the headers =20=
> that the "From:" address was not really the address from which they =20=
> were sent from.
>
>
> If you are still curious about the route this message followed, you =20=
> can follow the "Received from" "by" lines, starting from the last one =20=
> and going upwards. Keep in mind that some of the bottom "Received =20
> from" "by" lines can also be fake.
>
>
> ----
> This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2003 board on =20
> Church of Virus BBS.
> <
http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/=20> index.php?board=3D54;action=3Ddisplay;threadid=3D29195>
> ---
> To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to =20
> <
http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>