logo Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
2024-12-29 07:38:21 CoV Wiki
Learn more about the Church of Virus
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Do you want to know where you stand?

  Church of Virus BBS
  General
  Humor & Satire

  Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
   Author  Topic: Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion  (Read 2580 times)
Blunderov
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 3160
Reputation: 8.59
Rate Blunderov



"We think in generalities, we live in details"

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
« on: 2007-05-26 07:52:14 »
Reply with quote

[Blunderov] I knew it!
theonion

Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
May 23, 2007 | Issue 43•21

Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
CHICAGO—In a surprising refutation of the conventional wisdom on opinion entitlement, a study conducted by the University of Chicago's School for Behavioral Science concluded that more than one-third of the U.S. population is neither entitled nor qualified to have opinions.

"On topics from evolution to the environment to gay marriage to immigration reform, we found that many of the opinions expressed were so off-base and ill-informed that they actually hurt society by being voiced," said chief researcher Professor Mark Fultz, who based the findings on hundreds of telephone, office, and dinner-party conversations compiled over a three-year period. "While people have long asserted that it takes all kinds, our research shows that American society currently has a drastic oversupply of the kinds who don't have any good or worthwhile thoughts whatsoever. We could actually do just fine without them."

In 2002, Fultz's team shook the academic world by conclusively proving the existence of both bad ideas during brainstorming and dumb questions during question-and-answer sessions.

Report to moderator   Logged
Walter Watts
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 1571
Reputation: 8.56
Rate Walter Watts



Just when I thought I was out-they pull me back in

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re:Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
« Reply #1 on: 2007-05-29 16:55:18 »
Reply with quote

Blunderov.

Thanks for this one old friend.

It explains so much.

Now I understand the source of all this irrational disinformation we have to put up with in our daily lives.

I think 38 percent might be a low estimate though.


Walter


PS--I chuckled at this off and on all day, plus it reminded me to check in at the Onion on a daily basis. I had gotten out of the habit but will correct that!
Report to moderator   Logged

Walter Watts
Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc.


No one gets to see the Wizard! Not nobody! Not no how!
Hermit
Archon
*****

Posts: 4289
Reputation: 8.74
Rate Hermit



Prime example of a practically perfect person

View Profile WWW
Re:Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
« Reply #2 on: 2007-05-29 19:32:24 »
Reply with quote

Dear friends, 98.997% of "conventional wisdom" is simply wrong. The other 1.003% is made up of dubious statistics of indeterminate origin and spurious accuracy*.

Love Hermit

*In this case the statisticas are completely credible and of known origin. They were inspired by several large tonics diluted to the proper extent with a splash of angostura and loads of gin.
Report to moderator   Logged

With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. - Steven Weinberg, 1999
Blunderov
Archon
*****

Gender: Male
Posts: 3160
Reputation: 8.59
Rate Blunderov



"We think in generalities, we live in details"

View Profile WWW E-Mail
Re:Study: 38 Percent Of People Not Actually Entitled To Their Opinion
« Reply #3 on: 2007-05-30 17:50:33 »
Reply with quote


Quote from: Walter Watts on 2007-05-29 16:55:18   
--I chuckled at this off and on all day, plus it reminded me to check in at the Onion on a daily basis. I had gotten out of the habit but will correct that!


[Blunderov] The Onion: an oasis of (somewhat sardonic) sanity. Did you catch this one yet?

(Progress comrades, great progress!)

Genetically modified farmers.
http://www.theonion.com/2056-06-22/news/4/
DC—The Department of HyperAgriculture announced Monday that it will begin investigating possible restrictions on the cultivation, implementation, and breeding of genetically modified farmers, weighing possible safety and health risks against the farmers' dramatically increased yield and efficiency.

"As evidenced by the many strong opinions regarding these farmers, we can all agree that more research needs to be done," said Secretary of HyperAgriculture Roald McDonald in a press conference this morning. "Whatever happens, we cannot let our growing population's need for more and better foods lead us recklessly into the creation of 'Frankenfarmers.'"

McDonald added: "That said, I can't deny the benefits of an agricultural laborer who subsists on common weeds, grows his own exo-overalls, sweats pesticides, and whose six arms end in retractable plows, scythes, and harrows."

Several larger North American corporate states are already using GM farmers to perform specialized or time-sensitive tasks. Monsanto-Idaho has successfully used a gene-gineered strain of Mountain Anderson farmer, noted for its ability to scale great heights and farm potatoes on the sheer faces of Rocky Mountain cliffs. A similar genetic model was used to create the MegaHusker, seven of which now cultivate 85 percent of Nebraska. Likewise, McCormick-Beatrice has vastly increased the shellfish and kelp harvest off the Oregon coast by using fin- and gill-equipped Eugenic Mermen.

The risks associated with GM farmers are well-documented.�

Coding errors in the genetic blueprints of some common GM-farmer models have led to congenital defects, such as the inability to distinguish between terrified migrant workers and large produce items like pumpkins. Additionally, some scientists allege that GM farmers could breed with non-modified farmers, resulting in unforseeable mutations.

"We've been assured by the patent-holding companies that these farmers are sterile, and pose no danger of contaminating standard human bloodlines," McDonald said. "Contrary to stories you may have heard, there will be no havoc wreaked by a countryside populated by super-lascivious farmers' daughters."

However, some argue that the solitary lifestyle many GM farmers lead as a result of their sterility poses a danger to area residents.

"These farmers were created from human stock, and face many of the same problems as traditional farmers," said Jans Karlsen, an agricultural-oversight officer with the Second UN. "The poor creatures suffer from depression, obesity, alcoholism, and loneliness just like 'normal' farmers, but their enhanced attributes serve to amplify the effects. We're not likely to soon forget what happened when that MegaHusker went on a three-day drinking binge in downtown Omaha last year. He sang 'He Stopped Loving Her Today' for three hours at close to 150 decibels and blew out windows as far away as Lincoln. Traffic was stalled for a week while he slept it off on the downtown highway interchange."

Critics have lobbied for the scaling back or elimination of GM farming, but hyper-farming-industry leaders say it's too late to turn back the clock.

"We can't put the genie back in the bottle," Monsanto North head of research Sam Houseman said. "GM farmers are indispensable to modern agriculture. It takes 20 normal Nebraska farmers to harvest, shuck, and crib one ear of Titanicorn. Special climbing equipment and helicopter pilots are needed to tend Rocky Mountain boulder-tubers. And I frankly don't know how a wrangler with only two arms—neither of which ends in a prehensile lariat or bio-electric prod—would deal with a runaway MonSteer."

McDonald said his panel will reach a decision on GM-farmer regulations by the end of the year, adding that it is inevitable that some form of GM farmer is "here to stay."

"It would be unfair to deny the American agricultural industry the genetic-engineering advantages already enjoyed by Asian and European farmers," McDonald said. "In addition, it would seem strangely restrictive to deny the farming industry GM technology already so widespread in fields like large-scale construction, computer programming, pornography, and professional sports."



Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] Reply Notify of replies Send the topic Print 
Jump to:


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Church of Virus BBS | Powered by YaBB SE
© 2001-2002, YaBB SE Dev Team. All Rights Reserved.

Please support the CoV.
Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS! RSS feed