RE virus: More bush democracy

From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:27:32 MST

  • Next message: Erik Aronesty: "Re: RE virus: More bush democracy"

    [Blunderov]<sighs>
    By their fruits ye shall know them.
    Best Regards

    <q>
    Haiti once again, is ablaze. Almost nobody, however, understands that
    today's chaos was made In Washington - deliberately, cynically and
    steadfastly. History will bear this out. In the meantime, political,
    social and economic chaos will deepen and Haiti's impoverished people
    will suffer.

    The Bush administration has been pursuing policies likely to topple
    Jean-Bertrand, Aristide since 2001. The hatred began when Aristide, then
    a parish priest and democracy campaigner against Haiti's ruthless
    Duvalier dictatorship, preached liberation theology in the 1980s. US
    conservatives branded him the next Fidel Castro.

    Conservative disdain multiplied several-fold when former president Bill
    Clinton put Aristide in power after a coup blocked him from electoral
    victory in 1994. Conservatives mocked Clinton for wasting US efforts on
    "nation building" in Haiti. This is the same right wing that has
    squandered $160 billion on a far more violent and dubious effort at
    "nation building" in Iraq.

    Attacks on Aristide began as soon as the Bush administration assumed
    office. I visited him in Port-au-Prince in 2001. He was intent on good
    relations with Haiti's private sector and the US. He sought advice on
    how to reform his economy and explained his concerns that the US right
    would try to wreck his presidency.

    Haiti was in a desperate state: the most impoverished country in the
    western hemisphere, with a standard of living comparable to sub-Saharan
    Africa, despite being only a few hours by air from Miami. Life
    expectancy was 52 years. Of every 1000 children born, more than 100 died
    before their fifth birthday. An HIV-Aids epidemic, the worst in the
    Caribbean, was running unchecked. Tourists and investors were staying
    away, so there were no jobs to be had.

    But Aristide was enormously popular. Together with Pail Farmer, the
    legendary Haitian HIV-Aids doctor, I visited villages in the Central
    Plateau. Everybody referred to Aristide affectionately as "Titid" Here
    was an elected leader with the backing of Haiti's poor, the bulk of the
    population. When 1 returned to Washington, I spoke to senior officials
    in the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, Inter-American
    Development Bank, and Organisation of American States, expecting to hear
    that they would be rushing to help Haiti.

    Instead, they were all suspending aid under vague Instructions from the
    US. The US, It seemed, was unwilling to release aid to Haiti because of
    irregularities in the 2000 legislative elections, and was insisting that
    Aristide make peace with the opposition. The US position was a travesty.
    Aristide had been elected president in an Indisputable landslide. He was
    the popularly elected leader of the country - a claim George Bush cannot
    make about himself.

    Nor were the results of the legislative elections in 2000 in doubt:
    Aristide's party had also won in a landslide. It was claimed that
    Aristide's party had stolen a few seats. If true - and the allegation
    remains unproved - it would be nothing different from what has occurred
    in dozens of countries around the world receiving support from the IMP,
    World Bank and the US itself. By any standard, Haiti's elections had
    marked a step forward in democracy, compared to the decades of military
    dictatorships backed by the US, not to mention long periods of direct US
    military occupation.

    The more one sniffed around Washington the less the US position made
    sense. By saying that aid would be frozen until Aristide and the
    political opposition reached an agreement, the Bush administration
    provided Haiti's un-elected opposition with an open-ended veto.
    Aristide's foes merely had to refuse to bargain in order to plunge Haiti
    into chaos.

    That chaos has come. It is sad to hear rampaging students on BBC and CNN
    saying that Aristide "lied" because he didn't improve the country's
    social conditions. Yes, Haiti's economic collapse is fuelling rioting
    and deaths, but the lies were not Aristide's. The lies came from
    Washington. Aristide's opponents know that US right-wingers will stand
    with them.
    </q>

    (c)Project Syndicate

    Jeffrey D Sachs is Professor of economics and Director of the Earth
    Institute at Columbia University

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 03 2004 - 04:35:35 MST