virus: Re:The Disciplinary Process of the Church of Virus

From: Hermit (virus@hermit.net)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 18:21:26 MDT

  • Next message: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Two requests for tonight debate"

    We are talking about: http://virus.lucifer.com/wiki/DisciplinaryProcess

    This document contains authorizations via three votes, all referenced at the top of the page:

    Should the CoV accept the policy of disownment as documented at http://virus.lucifer.com/wiki/Disownment (http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=;action=voteResults;idvote=34)

    This is of course the most important one as it established the process, powers and methodology. Rather than pointing people to a page on "Disownment" to explain the "Disciplinary Process" (where disownment is only the last step), we have established a separate page under VirianPolicy to deal with the disciplinary process.

    Do you support the rules outlined in David's message Here comes the sheriff? (http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=;action=voteResults;idvote=10)

    The disciplinary process inherit's the "Sheriffs powers" at an administrative level by delegation.

    [http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=;action=voteResults;idvote=36]What period after disownment should ex-members be allowed to reapply for membership[/url]

    Finally, the period during which an appeal may not be reconsidered was extended by a vote requested by Casey, and because of that is included in the authorizations.

    Kind Regards

    Hermit 

    ----
This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS.
<http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=29437>
---
To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 18:21:37 MDT