On 7 Sep 2002 at 14:20, Archibald Scatflinger wrote:
>
> [joe]
> > I do not believe it is much of a stretch to say that others also
> > find your conspiratorial quackery to be distasteful and bizarre.
> > Others here have commented as much. Even Hermit has called you on
> > them. Why don't we take a poll as to whether list members find your
> > cross- posted paranoias in the least believable?
> > >
>
> [hermit](from past email)
> >Speak for yourself Joe Dees. You do not speak for me.
> >Archibald may entertain some theories I regard as nutty, but at least
> >he is
> polite, responds to questions and criticism, and >can support why he
> holds his opinions. Indeed he is doing far better than you are these
> days.
>
> >Hermit
>
> >PS Archibald, I liked your collection of quotes. Thanks.
>
See; although he liked the quotes, he considered the theories to be
nutty. He may not politically favor my position on a conventional pre-
emptive Iraqi regime change, but, considering the mountain of evidence
I have marshalled in its defence, he could only describe it as 'nutty' if he
insisted upon being willfully and contrarily blind.
Then again, maybe he will so describe it (and that, for him, would be a
self-description), since there can be no *objective* doubt that I have
supported my position quantum leaps better than you have supported
your cross-posted arcane conspiracy-nut phantasies (mainly because
you cannot do so, as they are cross-posted arcane conspiracy-nut
phantasies).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:22 MDT