August 6, 2002 No.105
High Ranking Iranian Conservative Cleric Resigns Over
Regime's Failures
By Ayelet Savyon
Ayatollah Jalal Al-Din Taheri, the Friday preacher of the city of
Isfahan, recently announced his resignation from the post he had
held for over three decades. He explained that his resignation was
in protest of Iran's human rights violations, the regime's failure to
meet the people's expectations of the 1979 Islamic Revolution,
and the harsh situation of unemployment, poverty, the spread of
prostitution, illegal drug use, and AIDS. Ayatollah Taheri's
announcement came on the eve of the anniversary of the 1999
student riots, which had stirred up the country and been harshly
suppressed at the time by the regime. [1]
Ayatollah Taheri's Letter of Resignation
Ayatollah Taheri's letter of resignation, which appeared in the
press, addressed five main points:
I. The Regime's Failure to Live Up to the Public's
Expectations
"¦For 23 years the nation has suffered, while many exploited
their power for political and financial gain¦ Is this what we
promised the oppressed? ...How much longer will we be able to
repeat the same speeches to the public, and organize meetings and
conferences¦ How long will neglect, ignorance, and [drug]
addiction [continue]? Now, when the Shah [Pahlavi] and
America no longer rule this country, why do the [rulers] not listen
to [our] criticism about the misery, the flaws [in the regime], and
the problems we are experiencing?¦"
"The great catastrophe of the flight from religion, disillusionment,
unemployment, inflation, poverty, the deepening of the disparities
between the classes, [economic] stagnation, and the drop in state
revenue, the sick economy, and administrative corruption¦ the
embezzlement and bribery and absence of an effective solution [to
all these]¦ have tragic consequences, and each moment they
threaten¦ the state and the life of the nation¦"
"We have failed to solve the state's many problems through
boasting, lies, violating human rights, chasing after factional
interests, and spreading empty slogans. Our main failures are not
maintaining the rule of law, the activity of irresponsible non-
civilian institutions, the presence of mafia-like groups in the
[political] arena, the restrictions placed on the Majlis
[parliament], and more." II. The Security Forces are
Responsible for Iran's Bloody Events
Referring to the murders of intellectuals and politicians in 1998
and during the 1999 student dormitory incident at the University
of Tehran which led to rioting across the country, Ayatollah
Taheri accused plainclothes security forces of having direct
responsibility for three events: "The agents caused the disgraceful
and ugly events on the university [of Tehran] campus [in 1999].
These agents murdered innocent people in an episode of serial
murders¦ What did they achieve besides tarnishing the image of
the Islamic [regime] system [and its image] in the international
arena?"
III. Criticism of Clerics and Their Exploitation of Islam
"¦Patrons of groups with clubs on their shoulders¦ claw their
way through the religious ranks and through the people's beliefs,
rule with cruelty, and hasten to the political arena. They want to
wed violence to religion, and defile all that is holy. [These]
fascist[s]... who link ignorance and insanity to the centers of the
regime, do whatever they want, throw off all restraints, and go
unpunished by the Judiciary and untried by the law. They set
religious rulings, and are also philosophers, muftis, and judges.
They do what they like and rule as they please¦"
IV. A Call for Ayatollah Montazari's Release
Ayatollah Taheri called for the release of Ayatollah Montazari,
once designated Ayatollah Khomeini's successor, who has been
under house arrest since 1996 for criticizing the Islamic
regime.[2] "The unjustified tragedy of the reactionary and
inhuman incarceration of the religious jurisprudent [i.e.
Montazari] has grave results and a shameful end," he wrote.
Ayatollah Taheri warned Supreme Leader 'Ali Khamenei that
his regime was becoming illegitimate in the eyes of the public: "A
regime may hold [if it] is heretical, but not if it is oppressive."
V. Bemoaning the Degradation of the Clerics' Status
Ayatollah Taheri discussed the decline in the status of clerics.
"The leading Shiite clerics have [always] both policed and
supported the regime.[3] The clerics have always been the
guardians of the people, and the nation has always placed its trust
in the leading religious jurisprudents.[4] The clerics were a
stronghold of the state's strength¦ This was the situation from
[Ayatollah] Qalimi to [Ayatollah] Khomeini. Woe is us¦ We
are filled with sorrow witnessing the decline of the status of
clerics today and the degradation of the status of religious
jurisprudents! [We] are sorrowful and pained that the steadfast
fortress of religious jurisprudents of the Shi'a is being devoured at
the hands of those who start riots in the political arena, and at the
hands of the clowns on the dais of leadership, who vex and abuse
[the population]¦"[5]
The Reformists React
Ayatollah Taheri's letter sparked political unrest. In a letter signed
by 125 Majlis members expressing their solidarity with him, they
wrote: "¦ You are considered to be among those eminent clerics
who have remained righteous and have not exploited their power.
We hope that your comments will be heard [by] the [regime's]
upper echelons and that the rights of the people will be
upheld."[6]
Iran Islamic Participation Front (IIPF), the political faction of
the majority of Majlis's reformists, also published a statement
supporting Ayatollah Taheri's move: "For years the patriots and
true supporters of the Islamic [regime] system [i.e. the reformists]
have complained about the top officials in one way or another.
[But] no one ever bothered to notice their demands. Today, they
see their aspirations materialized in [Taheri's] move."[7]
The Conservatives React
Once they understood the intensity and ramifications of the crisis,
the conservative circles moved immediately to neutralize it. A few
hours after Ayatollah Taheri's letter was released, the Supreme
National Security Council issued a sweeping order banning any
discussion of the affair in the media. However, the Nourouz daily
reported this development in bold black headlines, under which
appeared a notice that they were forbidden to publish the story by
order of the Security Council. A closure order was issued against
the reformist newspaper Azad (Freedom), which defied the
Security Council's order.[8]
The council's order applied only to reformist papers; it took no
steps against conservative papers, which discussed the matter in
depth.[9] The Kayhan daily wrote that Ayatollah Taheri's letter
was fabricated: "Anyone well-versed in Ayatollah Taheri's writing
style has no doubt that this letter was not written by him and that
some of the claims raised are not his ideas¦ It would appear that
certain people have exploited the Ayatollah's senility, because
[these] comments differ radically from his previous
positions."[10]
An additional line taken by the conservative press was to question
the loyalty of Ayatollah Taheri's supporters, stating that they were
undermining the regime. The Resalat daily, for example, said in
an editorial that Taheri and those around him were not acting in
accordance with Islamic principles and that his cronies were
conspiring against the regime.[11] Jomhur-i Eslami hinted that
although Taheri had declared his solidarity with the people, with
Islam, and with the Islamic regime, he was actually supporting a
dissident “ Ayatollah Montazari. The paper called Taheri's letter
a "gimmick" and claimed that gimmicks of this type could not
harm the regime.[12] Resalat preferred to divert Taheri's criticism
of Supreme Leader Khamenei and the ruling clerics to President
Muhammad Khatami, saying that Taheri's criticism of Khatami's
reformist government was "truly unfair¦"[13]
Supreme Leader Khamenei's Response
As in previous political crises,[14] Supreme Leader 'Ali
Khamenei intervened to defuse the crisis before it undermined
the stability of his regime. His intervention, which this time was
immediate, addressed two main areas: 1) Warning top officials,
particularly leading clerics, against criticizing the regime; and 2)
Incriminating critics of the regime (and by inference Ayatollah
Taheri) by associating them with the enemies of the regime,
primarily the US “ in keeping with Islamic Revolution discourse.
Following Ayatollah Taheri's criticism of his leadership,
Khamenei issued a highly unusual statement that was issued
before Friday prayers in mid-July. In it, he warned officials
against making "remarks which might be misused by internal and
external enemies [of the state]." He addressed Ayatollah Taheri
personally, trying to put the blame for the situation in Iran on
President Khatami and the reformists: "I have warned the officials
about these facts on numerous occasions, and called on them to
pool their efforts and capabilities to fight poverty, corruption, and
discrimination."[15] In other words, Supreme Leader Khamenei,
as usual, accused enemies of the regime of disseminating anti-
Iranian propaganda with the aim of toppling Iran's regime.
Khamenei rebuked Ayatollah Taheri, explaining that he only
served the enemies of the regime: "All the enemies of the Islamic
Revolution fed by the U.S. and Israel have benefited [from your
announcement of resignation] and are saying that the letter proves
[that the public] rejects the doctrine of the Imam [Khomeini]¦"
Referring to the American administration, Khamenei stated that in
order to "actualize [its] threats against Iran, the U.S.
administration needs a firm popular base to take revenge on the
[regime] of the [Islamic] revolution, on Islam, and on the Imam
[Khomeini], and in order to reestablish a government similar to
the dictatorship of the Pahlavi regime." He called this "a futile
and idiotic dream, as their repeated misanalysis of events in Iran
bring about nothing but despair and frustration for them¦"
In a rare move, leader Khamenei referred to the house arrest of
Ayatollah Montazari. Khamenei stated that Ayatollah Montazari
was under house arrest because he had violated Supreme Leader
Khamenei's instructions to refrain from engaging in political
activity: "In order to combat financial corruption, one does not
need to look far, but has to start from one's own household, and
relatives' [households], since we all remember what happened to
one of the late Imam's [meaning Khomeini's] disciples who was
banned from political affairs by the Imam, when he could have
spared himself and the country the ensuing problems had he paid
due attention to the wise advice of his master and guide [Imam
Khomeini]." These words were also a warning to Ayatollah
Taheri.
Following the Supreme Leader's threat, Taheri called on the
public to participate in demonstrations protesting U.S.
involvement in Iran's domestic affairs. At the same time, he
reiterated his call not to halt the reform process.[16]
[1] The riots broke out after students protested against the closure
of the Salam newspaper for criticizing the regime. Plainclothes
security forces burst into University of Tehran dormitories and
beat students; and rioting spread throughout the country. A public
outcry arose when police arrested not the attackers but the
students who had been attacked. Since then, the reformists have
demanded the release of dozens of students still imprisoned.
[2] Ayatollah Montazari criticized the state of affairs in which
clerics were the actual rulers (the principle of "Rule of the
Jurisprudent") instituted by Ayatollah Khomeini. Montazari called
to restore the previous system “ when clerics were mere
consultants to the regime, not the actual rulers. Montazari, who
was removed from the position of successor by Ayatollah
Khomeini himself a short time before his death, is considered a
prestigious religious jurisprudent.
[3] Until the Shah was deposed, the top clerics were advocates of
the people and defended them against the Shah. They led several
socio-economic protest movements against the Shah and against
foreign intervention in Iran, among them the Tobacco Rebellion
of 1891-2 and the Constitutional Revolution in 1905-7. After the
Islamic Revolution, clerics became rulers; thus Islam became
identified with politics and subject to social criticism, and the
clerics lost their representative status. Ayatollah Taheri lamented
the degradation in the status of the leading jurisprudents since
Khamenei's appointment as Supreme Leader; Khamenei's
religious knowledge was not nearly sufficient to earn him the title
of Ayatollah but nevertheless he was appointed to succeed
Khomenei because no prominent Ayatollah would agree to take
the post. It should also be pointed out that most regime officials
are low-ranking clerics with the religious title hujjat al-Islam,
such as former president Hashemi Rafsanjani (who is also
sometimes called Ayatollah out of respect).
[4] Religious jurisprudents are considered "sources of emulation"
(marlij'eh taqlid) in Iran.
[5] Nourouz, July 10, 2002.
[6] Azad, July 11, 2002.
[7] Azad, July 11, 2002.
[8] In its defense, Azad maintained that the Security Council's
order did not reach it before press time. Nevertheless, the paper
remained banned despite a protest by seven other reformist papers
sent to President Khatami, and despite the government's
condemnation of the illegal closure (Nourouz, July 11, 2002; July
14, 2002).
[9]Nourouz compiled a list of 25 articles condemning Ayatollah
Taheri that appeared in the conservative Resalat, Jomhur-i
Eslami, Kayhan, Entekhab, Harim and Siyasat-i Rouz in only
three days (Nourouz July 16, 2002). See also Nourouz's protest in
an editorial from July 15, 2002, and Hayat-e No, July 16, 2002.
[10] Kayhan, July 10, 2002.
[11] Resalat, July 14, 2002.
[12] Jomhur-i Eslami, July 11, 2002.
[13] Resalat, July 11, 2002.
[14] See the December 2001 affair of the arrest of Majlis member
Hussein Loqmanian. The arrest threatened the stability of the
regime, as it led Majlis Chairman Mahdi Karroubi to resign in
protest. The crisis was resolved only when Loqmanian was
released three weeks later on Khamenei's orders. The prison
sentences of other Majlis members were not carried out.
[15] IRNA, July 12, 2002.
[16] Nourouz, July 18, 2002.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:21 MDT