On 16 Aug 2002 at 11:28, Jonathan Davis wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hermit" <hidden@lucifer.com>
> To: <virus@lucifer.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 10:14 AM
> Subject: virus: US adviser warns of Armageddon
>
>
> >
> > US adviser warns of Armageddon
>
>
> I read this on the tube this morning and I must say I agree with this
> guy. I think an actual invasion would be a mistake at this time. That
> said, perhaps all this invasion talk is just a feint to get Saddam to
> comply with the UN again. Whatever is done, I also agree with
> Condoleezza - "We certainly do not have the luxury of doing nothing".
> The leaves us with the question: What is to be done about Saddam?
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan
>
When the cost of a Saddamic nuclear attack upon a US with its troops
safely ensconsed in stateside bases is factored against the cost of
toppling Saddam Hussein via US troops yet, by that action, reaping the
benefit of avoiding such an attack in a cost-benefit analysis, ousting the
bastard before he can obtain and pull a nuclear trigger wins hands
down.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:19 MDT