>
> And there are many more essays that are highly germane to our
> discussions there.
> >
When I saturated the list with articles supporting a point (that the people
controlling the U.S. Government are very much trying to start a war with the
support of the U.S. Citizens with the purpose of implementing a one world
government) I was written off as being a conspiracy theorist with no actual
supporting arguments proving that this is not correct. I was told to make my
point using only a few reference articles. I responded with what I thought
was an interesting argument.
( See Re: virus: Notice to TransDimensional Elf)
This posting was totally ignored by everyone on the list including the very
Pro-U.S brainwashed suckers.
Im curious why.
Is it because my argument was invalid in some way? If so, how was it
invalid?
Was it because it doesn't fit very well with the Pro-America mindset?
Fear?
I don't disrespect anyone on this list but I refuse to take any argument,
that blames anyone other then the U.S government for the recent attacks on
the WTC, seriously until you prove to me that my points about "THE GRAND
CHESSBOARD - American Primacy And It's Geostrategic Imperatives,"
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Basic Books, 1997." are invalid for some reason.
Smile
Archibald
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:18 MDT