On Saturday 03 August 2002 10:49 pm, you wrote:
> > [rhinoceros]
> > So it seems. Then, it is the old argument of using 9/11 as an argument
> > for preemptive strikes. Back to square one.
The problem with "pre-emptive" strikes is that it assumes people are going to
follow through on their threats, which is very rarely the case. If the US
sent armed forces into every country that stated it didn't like their foreign
policy, you might as well break out the nukes, 'cos the entire planet is
fucked,
-- === Mark 'Nurgle' Collins http://www.thisisnurgle.org.uk Stupid IRC quote of the <variable time period>: <phoenix> insider, you'll have to excuse nurgle, he's the epitamy of evil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:17 MDT