On 2 Aug 2002 at 11:41, Jonathan Davis wrote:
He'll try anything, licit or il-.
>
> Come on Hermit. Do you really think you can get away with a cheap
> trick like this? :)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hermit" <hidden@lucifer.com>
> To: <virus@lucifer.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 10:51 AM
> Subject: Re:virus: UN report on Jenin released - Israel not guilty
>
>
> >
> > massacre
> >
> > \\Mas"sa*cre\\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Massacred; p. pr. & vb. n.
> Massacring.] [Cf. F. massacrer. See Massacre, n.] To kill in
> considerable numbers where much resistance can not be made; to kill
> with indiscriminate violence, without necessity, and contrary to the
> usages of nations; to butcher; to slaughter; -- limited to the killing
> of human beings. > > If James should be pleased to massacre them all,
> as Maximian had massacred the Theban legion. --Macaulay. > Source:
> Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. >
> [hr] > Yes, considerable numbers were killed. - 'considerable' is a
> subjective standard. Given the scale of the fighting a tiny number
> died. . > Yes, much resistance could not be made - Incorrect,
> 'considerable' resistance was made in this armed camp. > Yes,
> indiscriminate violence was deployed. - This is simply false. > Yes,
> It was without necessity - This is simply false. > Yes, contrary to
> the usage of nations - This is simply and demonstrably false. > Yes,
> Palestinians are human beings too. - This is of course true but
> irrelevant. These humans were not massacred. > > Was there a massacre?
> You choose.
>
> Of course not. Ask the UN, the Palestinians and the Israeli's - they
> all agree: No.
>
> Regards
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:17 MDT