"In this case, just as with the Soviet case, the US sees itself threatened
globally, and for good reason. The only law that the adversaries
recognize is Shar'ia."
Am I to take it that an illegal attack on Iraq, a state which is essentially a secular totalitarian dictatorship (and which is not governed by Shar'ia), for which the support of various Islamic fundamentalist dictatorships such as Saudi Arabia (which is governed by Shar'ia) will be neccessary, is being justified as opposition to the threat of Shar'ia as a form of global hegemony? May I respectfully observe that this list of allies and adversaries are currently in the wrong order? Should you not get on the hotline to the Whitehouse and point this out?
---- This message was posted by kharin to the Virus 2002 board on Church of Virus BBS. <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;threadid=25860>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:17 MDT