On 25 Jul 2002 at 23:30, Dr Sebby wrote:
> ...however, our interpretation of everything is relative due to our
> sensorium filters known as nerves, eyes, ears, brain, and nose. but since
> that is going to be universally true for anything biological or otherwise
> which tries to 'interpret' anything; is there any real point in me
> mentioning it? there shouldnt be.
>
Our sensorium does not detect all the levels of all the possible modes
originating or reflecting from an object, true, but that renders it
incomplete, not incorrect. Countless millennia have selected the
sensorium most consonant with our survival and reprodiction, and this
would have to include, for us, a capacity to sensuously construct a
workable (thus veridical) model of the environing world.
>
> drsebby.
> "Courage...and shuffle the cards".
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:16 MDT