Re:virus: Gender and Nature in Contemporary NeoPaganism

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 11:18:18 MDT


On 24 Jul 2002 at 10:57, kharin wrote:

>
> The Biblical admonitions against homosexuality are indeed univocal on
> the issue, but it is for JCIZ religions an ethical or moral issue and
> matters not to the religions' metaphysical stance.
>
> I would still see that issue as being much more likely to undermine a christian stance than the other two you have selected (for example, your reading of Genesis where god bequeathes command of the animal kingdom to man, seems at least as restrictive as the interpretation of the incident with
the centurion I referred to previously); christian morality is a morality of self abnegation and denial; it can hardly begin asserting that sex serves any purpose other than a procreative one, as that would change the entire basis of its moral proposition into a permissive one. Little time to
post at present; with your permission, will seek to elucidate said points at a more opportune moment.
>
I also wanted to mention that the catholic Church encouraged the
veneration of Mary as a submissive saint and model for motherhood at
least in part to lure acolytes away from the goddess religions, which
they slandered both with the example of Eve's daring to eat of the fruit
of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and also with the Lilith myth.
> ----
> This message was posted by kharin to the Virus 2002 board on Church of Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;threadid=25764>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 22 2002 - 05:06:16 MDT