And animism is as bad as any other irrational, unjustifiable belief. Once
you "accept" one thing by "faith" you cannot any longer claim to be
"reasonable". That has far worse implications than any "harshness" which
might be implied by truth. And truth cannot be qualified. "Secular truth"
does not exist. According to one's perspective, either something is "true"
or it is "false". Of course, that ignores reality and pretends that we can
unfuzz the inherent grayness of the universe :-)
I would suggest that a thorough basing in reality is vastly more important
for any child than any amount of "comforting", and might lead to a reversal
of the growing "new-ageianist" tendency to regard the world as an irrational
and non-understandable environment.
TheHermit
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf Of
Joe Strickland
Sent: Friday, December 04, 1998 7:52 PM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: Angels or what?
Try telling the child that the relative is still alive, but just in a
different body, such as that of an animal, tree, etc., but it is impossible
to know which one. This is an acceptable explanation among mainstream
religions, comforting to the child, and cannot be disproved by the child. Of
course, you run the risk of the child growing up to be an Animist, but
personally I see little wrong with that. You could even plant a tree to be
the relative's new body or something to that effect (not a pet though,
because then it will die and you will have the same situation all over
again).
--Joe Strickland