> Looking at eric boyd's post (may've been someone else's originally)
> about laws against people damaging themselves, i was struck that
> the post was phrased in terms that sounded quite moralistic to me:
> what people OUGHT or OUGHT NOT to be allowed to do.
>
> I would've thought a memetic viewpoint on laws would be fairly free
> of moral judgements about behaviour (including making laws etc),
> but rather phrased in terms of questions like "why are these ideas
> more widespread than their opposites?"
Somebody already said this, but I'd just like to emphasize that this list,
despite Brodie's billing, is really about the CoV, and memetics is only one
(important) part of that.
And, as always, my opinions are my own[1].
ERiC
[1] Reminds me of the editorial section of the Campus Humour 'news'paper:
It's titled "An Opinion (not necessarily yours)"