> >It does not exist in the objective
> >world, being rather that for which the objective world
> >exists.
>
> Well, this is the core of my discontent.
>
Consciousness (read subjectivity) is always consciousness-of. Of
what? Objects (the "objective" world). It is an emergent property
which has risen out of the natural world to a position (read
perspective) from which it can view that from whence it came.
> How can anything be said not to exist in the objective world- where the
> 'objective world' is the universe?
>
The universe contains your brain, true; but your brain also contains
a *subjective* representation of the universe - at least those parts of
it which you have per- and/or conceived.
> And this- "that for which the objective world exists" is indeed a
> statement of the supernatural- that which is 'other' to the universe.
>
Wrong. See above.
> And as far as I know, clothes have to be made of materials.
>
But the emperor only perceives that he wears clothes by means of
the sense-impressions his nervous system gives him - and these are
subjective.
> **************************************
> Wade T. Smith
> morbius@channel1.com
> wade_smith@harvard.edu
> **************************************