Bob:
>A particular issue taken on faith may or may not contradict scientific
>evidence, that was not the point. The point was that faith aFrom owner-virus@maxwell.kumo.com Wed Aug 19 09:57:53 1998
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by maxwell.kumo.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA19404
for virus-outgoing; Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:57:53 -0600
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980818223148.007a94e0@king.cts.com>
X-Sender: tyucikas@king.cts.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 22:31:48 -0700
To: virus@lucifer.com
From: Tracy Yucikas <tyucikas@cts.com>
Subject: virus: viable non-replicating genes?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>And so if you have no children, your DNA contains no genes?
>Richard Brodie
no viable ones ... (by definition ?)
Suppport group facilitator, Renaissance home for non-replicating memes