Re: virus: Re: morality
Nathaniel Hall (natehall@WORLDNET.ATT.NET)
Tue, 04 Aug 1998 20:08:21 -0600
Kelley, Ian wrote:
>
> I agree! And while I hope that our erudite co-poster would
> share the sentiments, the second quote is, in fact, my own.
>
> - IK
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nathaniel Hall [SMTP:natehall@WORLDNET.ATT.NET]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 1998 6:35 AM
> > To: virus@lucifer.com
> > Subject: virus: Re: morality
> >
> > sodom wrote:
> > "I don't think anyone would suggest that morals are objective, but
> > they
> > are not
> > intended to be objective."
> >
> > I suggest that morality is objective! Furthermore it looks like you do
> > to:
> >
> > 'Morality is not necessarily based in a view of "what God wants"; it
> > doesn't have to derive from religion or from anything not verifiable,
> > it
> > can exist in an observable place outside of memetic transfer.'
> >
> > That not only makes it objective but objective and knowable!
> >
> > Nate H.
> >
> > I have seen the light and it's Sodom shining this time!
Well at least I know who's it was now.
Nate H.