>From owner-virus@lucifer.com Thu Jul 2 16:15:03
1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by maxwell.kumo.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA19631
> for virus-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 17:10:56
-0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com:
majordom set sender to owner-virus@lucifer.com using
-f
>Subject: virus: Spirited away
>Date: Thu, 2 Jul 98 19:10:50 -0400
>x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
>x-mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1
>From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
>To: <virus@lucifer.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Message-ID:
<19980702231029.AAA29336@[205.240.180.5]>
>Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>
>I said-
>
>>In the same way gene is 'written' on a gene....
>
>And you said-
>
>>I think we will find or designate a
>>thing which follows our pre-supposed criteria for
>>"meme" and only after declaring it THUS will it
come
>>to stand for the concept pending modification in
>>both the understanding and the boundaries of the
>>thing so designated.
>
>Now, I'm not being overly curt here, but didn't you
just say in dozens of
>words what I said in a few, and aren't we actually
saying the same thing?
>Mind you, I have no intention of declaring that the
name creates the
>object....
>
>
B. Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
http://www.window.to/mindrec
Bio: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay
See who's chatting about this topic:
http://www.talkcity.com/chat.cgi?room=MindRec
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com