Re: virus: Spirituality?

B. Lane Robertson (metaphy@hotmail.com)
Thu, 02 Jul 1998 13:28:09 PDT

No, not at all. I think we will find or designate a
thing which follows our pre-supposed criteria for
"meme" and only after declaring it THUS will it come
to stand for the concept pending modification in
both the understanding and the boundaries of the
thing so designated.

>From owner-virus@lucifer.com Thu Jul 2 04:39:21
1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by maxwell.kumo.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA25762
> for virus-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 05:37:01
-0600
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com:
majordom set sender to owner-virus@lucifer.com using
-f
>Subject: Re: virus: Spirituality?
>Date: Thu, 2 Jul 98 07:36:59 -0400
>x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
>x-mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1
>From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
>To: <virus@lucifer.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Message-ID:
<19980702113640.AAA21366@[205.240.180.117]>
>Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>
>>When we find (or
>>specify the limits of) a "meme"; do you think it
>>will have the word "meme" written on it?
>
>Yes. Don't you? (In the same way gene is 'written'
on a gene....')
>

B. Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
http://www.window.to/mindrec
Bio: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay
See who's chatting about this topic:
http://www.talkcity.com/chat.cgi?room=MindRec

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com