>Too long.
(And then he went on to quote the entire message he thought was too
long, over 400 lines of text)
No, Brett, it wasn't too long at all. It was long, but coherent,
legible, interesting, and relevant to the ideas discussed on this list.
Which, incidentally, can't be said about posts that are _426_ lines
long, and only express your petty opinion that the previous post was
"too long". Personally, I don't think anything is "too long" as long as
it adds more to the discussion than it quotes from it.
Dan, do you know if any research has been made into this idea about
"curiosity" being caused by withdrawal of endorphines and "injection" of
stressors? It sounds plausible enough, but that could be said about lots
of things that have turned out to be wrong.. You don't happen to know of
any material related to this subject that are available on the web?
-Andreas
(Great Randomness)