-----Original Message-----
From: sodom <Sodom@ma.ultranet.com>
To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: virus: Virus: Opinions?
>
>
>Johnny Rea wrote:
>
>> I don't really understand what you want me to say. I guess you think
that
>> unless
>> someone finds the bones of Adam and proves that his DNA was the first
human
>> DNA on the planet that you won't believe he was the father of all
mankind?
>
>First off, i dont know if you have ever heard of RNA before. But if you
had,
>you would know that there is no father of mankind like you think. That term
>does not apply. There is no possible way that a single man was the father
of
>the species. It is a nice thought though. If someone did find these bones,
>which could still exist if they are only a 6000 years old, they would not
be
>the first human bones or DNA. We have bones and DNA much older than that.
We
>recently found a whole body that was older than that frozen in ice.
>
>What I want you say is that even though you know it is impossible, you
believe
>because you just want to, not becasue there is any evidence to support it.
That
>is what I want you to say.
>
>Sodom
>
>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bob Hartwig <hartwig@ais.net>
>> To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 11:20 AM
>> Subject: Re: virus: Virus: Opinions?
>>
>> >At 10:28 AM 6/16/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> >>Normally I would agree with you but we have revelation from our
prophets
>> >>that state firmly and matter-of -factly that Adam was the father of all
>> >>mankind.
>> >>
>> >
>> >No way to argue with that. You know that big ON/OFF switch on the back
of
>> >your head? Johnny has turned his off.
>> >
>
>
>
>