> I don't really understand what you want me to say. I guess you think that
> unless
> someone finds the bones of Adam and proves that his DNA was the first human
> DNA on the planet that you won't believe he was the father of all mankind?
First off, i dont know if you have ever heard of RNA before. But if you had,
you would know that there is no father of mankind like you think. That term
does not apply. There is no possible way that a single man was the father of
the species. It is a nice thought though. If someone did find these bones,
which could still exist if they are only a 6000 years old, they would not be
the first human bones or DNA. We have bones and DNA much older than that. We
recently found a whole body that was older than that frozen in ice.
What I want you say is that even though you know it is impossible, you believe
because you just want to, not becasue there is any evidence to support it. That
is what I want you to say.
Sodom
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Hartwig <hartwig@ais.net>
> To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 11:20 AM
> Subject: Re: virus: Virus: Opinions?
>
> >At 10:28 AM 6/16/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >>Normally I would agree with you but we have revelation from our prophets
> >>that state firmly and matter-of -factly that Adam was the father of all
> >>mankind.
> >>
> >
> >No way to argue with that. You know that big ON/OFF switch on the back of
> >your head? Johnny has turned his off.
> >