> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe E. Dees <jdees0@students.uwf.edu>
> To: virus@lucifer.com <virus@lucifer.com>
> Date: 12 czerwca 1998 20:06
> Subject: Re: virus: Hail Virus!
>
> > Well, I loved your first post, quite interesting.
> Thanx
>
> > I am curious about your
> > definitions of L2, L3 and L4 religions. I did agree with what you were
> saying
> > though.
> Please allow me not to define those next levels, at the moment. They are too
> complicated, even to me ;-) I will try to produce some nice, English text
> about it in the nearest future, but currently I am too busy for that. In a
> two weeks time i will be able to post it.
>
> >The last sentence confuses me a litte, i need a reason why the Asian
> > religions would be more abstract.
> (Well, I was pretty sure that the reason would not be discussed, but I
> really didn't realize how strong is anti-genetic lobby here :-)
> I stated so, basing on a very well documented comparisons, eg. WAIS-R
> normalization tables, which show very clearly the diference between
> caucasoids and mongoloids. Those last scored about one SD higher in spatial
> ability tests. I am aware of similiar results in Raven's Progressive
> Matrices Test. There is an article in 'Scientific American' (May '98) about
> spatial and verbal abilities also.
> These results seem to be questionable [?] in view of some CoV'ers, but I
> cannot agree with such critiques.
>
> > Are you
> > suggesting that there is something about Asian culture that would more
> easily
> > support abstract god thinking instead of the west's monotheistic view??
> Yes and no. If they think abstractively in spite of theirs racial abilities,
> my ideas seem reasonable. But of course I didn't mean 'culture' but genetic
> profile.
>
> > As A. J. Greimas states in Chapter 10 of "On Meaning" (titled 'Knowing and
> >Believing: A Single Cognitive Universe), the only difference between
> >these two is external to the mind (the presence or absence of
> >evidence). The neuronal/synaptic flow patterns corresponding to
> >these two states of mind are indistinguishable.
> I haven't heard about this book, but I did about at least 12 stating
> contrary. I mean flow patterns may not be different but there are
> differences anyway.
> Of course there are differences (reread above). External ones.
> ---
> Michal Kulczycki
> University of Wroclaw, Psychology Dept.
> ICQ #: 8954988
> PS. I am used to cut post in a UseNet manner, I believe it is not a crime
> here.
>
>