I find that interesting. As to diminishing anything... well we humans have a
hard time dealing with anything we can not fit into comfortable patterns. I
know now how far it is from here to Andromeda. That has not diminished the
universe to me... It only makes it grander. But I can only speak personally,
emotionally, and even irrationally.
I have my own illusions. And I suspect that everyone else has theirs.
Perhaps you should "Dog" your "God"!
I know my dog is more godlike than many of the human beings I deal with daily...
heh
Kristee wrote:
> >Marie,
> >
> >At 11:25 AM 4/17/98 -0700, you wrote:
> >>Damn it! I do not believe in love! And I won't either until someone can
> >>prove that love exists!
> >
> >It doesn't make sense to ask for proof of an emotion. Emotions are defined
> >as being completely subjective, existing only in the mind of the perceiver.
>
> Hmm...not that I am taking sides, but what about the phrase "God IS
> Love".
> Well then, you could say, "I *felt* God". That would make God more of a
> religious feeling, a sort of 'enthusiasm', but not an omnipotent being.
> Marie, help me out...what DO Christians mean by saying "God is Love"? That
> would accurately fit the point you made, but at the same time it takes away
> from God...being God-like.
> {then again, you could also say, "I *God* my dog." =) }
>
> ~kjs
-- MarieWho in real life exists as
The Great Lady Casey, Citizen of Oasis, Sonoma Shard, Britannia