But, I do think that words are verbal forms of physical objects-- they,
by necessity, form a verbal-logical coherence according to the physical
characteristics of the objects they describe and this coherence is the
meaning of the word just as the physical characteristics are the meaning
of the physical object. SO, I do think that all experience can be
expressed by a few simple words.
Therefore, I also think that the term inutition is not well suited to
describe a non-conscious process... any more than any more than the term
"partical physics" describes the physical characteristics of a chair
(I've never heard of a partical for "brown" or "high backed" or "soft";
and I've never "intuited" how a chair functions).
While I like the story about the mind which thought but could not use
words in a linear manner; stil, I think this must be a represion of the
language function rather than a developmental truth.
Brett Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
www.window.to/mindrec
news:alt.pub.coffeehouse.amethyst