virus: Stop!

Levi Hopkins (levi_hopkins@hotmail.com)
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 07:59:08 PST

>From owner-virus-digest@lucifer.com Thu Feb 19 05:18:19 1998
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by maxwell.kumo.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA02099
> for virus-digest-outgoing; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 06:10:17 -0700
>Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 06:10:17 -0700
>Message-Id: <199802191310.GAA02099@maxwell.kumo.com>
>X-Authentication-Warning: maxwell.kumo.com: majordom set sender to
owner-virus-digest@lucifer.com using -f
>From: owner-virus-digest@lucifer.com (virus-digest)
>To: virus-digest@lucifer.com
>Subject: virus-digest V2 #388
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>Sender: owner-virus-digest@lucifer.com
>Errors-To: owner-virus-digest@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>
>
>virus-digest Thursday, February 19 1998 Volume 02 :
Number 388
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 07:44:06 -0800
>From: "Marie L. Foster" <mfos@ieway.com>
>Subject: Re: virus: Who's who on the web?
>
>I for one find Reed's observations good. Also, I must add that in the
>state of Washington it is a crime subject to civil penalties to
experiment
>on human subjects without going though a rigorous process of review. I
>think about the crime aspect of anything that has happened here because
I
>find myself the subject of more serious attack.
>
>My computer is being targeted by someone using WINNUKE or some other
>utility to render it useless to me. Luckily, I have more than one...
>hundreds actually, so I can keep in touch. But I am finding that the
legal
>authorities are not very helpful in taking on whoever has decided to do
>this to me.
>
>Marie, who has better things to do than erecting a firewall
>
>At 05:22 AM 2/17/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>Reed G. Konsler writes:
>>
>>> (Simon & Schuster) We are using life on the screen to engage in new
>>> ways of thinking about evolution, relationships, politics, sex, and
the
>>self.
>>
>>[clip]
>>
>>> One has to be able to move fluidly between different models, to keep
>>alternate
>>> hypotheses living in the same mind, to question assumptions but
still
>>move
>>> forward confidently on the best guesses one can make.
>>
>>I think "in the same mind" is the key example to set.
>>
>>-Prof. Tim
>>
>>
>Marie
>
>Marie L. Foster
>
><http://www.geocities.com/~mfos/>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 11:30:26 -0500
>From: "Reed G. Konsler" <konsler@ascat.harvard.edu>
>Subject: virus: Who's who?
>
>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 05:22:48 -0800
>From: "Tim Rhodes" <proftim@speakeasy.org>
>Subject: Re: virus: Who's who on the web?
>
>Reed G. Konsler writes:
>
>> (Simon & Schuster) We are using life on the screen to engage in new
>> ways of thinking about evolution, relationships, politics, sex, and
the
>self.
>
>[clip]
>
>> One has to be able to move fluidly between different models, to keep
>alternate
>> hypotheses living in the same mind, to question assumptions but still
>move
>> forward confidently on the best guesses one can make.
>
>I think "in the same mind" is the key example to set.
>
>- - -Prof. Tim
>- ---------------------------
>
>I'm not sure I understand the point you're making
>
>Reed
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 14:06:34 -0500
>From: Paul Prestopnik <pjp66259@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
>Subject: Re: virus: Brett and Richard,
>
>Eric Boyd wrote:
>
>> Hi virions!
>>
>> Just for the record, I'm convinced that it's Brodie who is deluded
and
>> deluding us here -- it's his lies which are confusing us.
>>
>> Brett's homepage is very large -- and Brett also began posting a long
time
>> ago (his first post was on June 26/97, see
>> http://www.lucifer.com/virus/virus.97/4497.html )
>>
>> If Richard = Brett then certainly Richard has spent far more time on
this
>> "experiment" than it deserved. His *real* experiment, I believe, is
>> happening right now, in watching how we treat both Brett and himself.
I for
>> one intend to do exactly as before -- although perhaps I'll take what
>> Richard says with a *larger* grain of salt.
>>
>> Additionally, I'd like to see a realization from Brett that it is his
own
>> mostly incomphensable posts which even allow Richard's silliness to
have
>> any effect.
>>
>> ERiC
>
>How do I know that you are not Richard? :)
>
>Initialy I was not sure whether to believe Richard or not, and I fully
expected
>to see a rebuttal from BLR. Because this rebuttal never occured, (In
fact BLR
>has not said anything about Brodie's stament) I am much more inclined
to
>believe Richard. Also regarding Richard's disapointment. I seem to
recall a
>post by Brett in which he stated that he felt his posts were being
ignored.
>That acknowledgement contradicts Brodie's saying we were hornswaggled.
>- -Paul Prestopnik
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 12:50:34 -0700
>From: David McFadzean <david@lucifer.com>
>Subject: Re: virus: Brett and Richard,
>
>At 02:06 PM 2/18/98 -0500, Paul Prestopnik wrote:
>
>>Initialy I was not sure whether to believe Richard or not, and I fully
>expected
>>to see a rebuttal from BLR. Because this rebuttal never occured, (In
fact
>BLR
>>has not said anything about Brodie's stament) I am much more inclined
to
>>believe Richard.
>
>That's not the only possible explanation for BLR's silence on the
issue.
>
>- --
>David McFadzean david@lucifer.com
>Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
>Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 98 18:36:48 -0500
>From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
>Subject: Re: virus: The experiment is over STOP ALREADY
>
>>(Sorry, Richard, if you want to get a hold of me you'll have to go
low-tech
>>and pick up the phone, I guess.)
>>
>>-Prof. Tim/Wade
>
>Uh, OK....
>
> *****************
> Wade T. Smith
>morbius@channel1.com | "There ain't nothin' you
>wade_smith@harvard.edu | shouldn't do to a god."
>morbius@cyberwarped.com |
>******* http://www.channel1.com/users/morbius/ *******
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of virus-digest V2 #388
>***************************
>
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com