virus: Remove

David Wall (david.wall@royagcol.ac.uk)
Thu, 12 Mar 1998 12:54:53 +0000

At 06:10 AM 2/23/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>virus-digest Monday, February 23 1998 Volume 02 : Number 389
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Sun, 22 Feb 98 20:49:26 -0500
>From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
>Subject: Re: virus: Bravado
>
>Yes, there are many that share [my] <belief1> that they are without
><beliefs2>.
>
>
> *****************
> Wade T. Smith
>morbius@channel1.com | "There ain't nothin' you
>wade_smith@harvard.edu | shouldn't do to a god."
>morbius@cyberwarped.com |
>******* http://www.channel1.com/users/morbius/ *******
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 01:42:20 -0600
>From: Rob Beeston <beeston.katrina@mcleaodusa.net>
>Subject: Re: virus: Brett and Richard,
>
><3.0.5.32.19980218125034.00ced3f0@lucifer.com>
><34EDE0D0.67B4969A@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-virus@lucifer.com
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
>
>Having been a subscriber for only a couple of weeks, I have been
>watching the amount of time and space devoted to the whole B/R business.
>
>Based on the discussion that I've seen, it seems most likely to me that
>Paul's suggestion that Richard and Brett are Co-conspiritors for the
>following reasons:
>
>1. Is appears that Brett, and his website, have been around long enough
>to make it unlikely that Richard would go to all the trouble.
>
>2. Brett did not seem that upset about Richard's remarks about him.
>
>3. The impression I got of Richard after reading his book, makes me more
>inclined to think that "The Experiment Ends" is his own 'clever' way of
>starting the experiment.
>
>Why?
>
>The people in the group are accustomed to Richard's ideas (memes) as
>well as Brett's. It would be an interesting experiment to take a group
>of people, who are already meme-sensitive, and throw them into a state
>of conflicting ideas and beliefs, because, after minimal input from the
>experimenters, a new belief system should be decided upon by the members
>of the group to be accepted as fact, regardless to the actual 'truth' of
>the belief.
>
>Unfortunatly, If enough of you agree with me, you will have also
>satisfied his experiment.
>
>Remember Parsons Grand Unification-
>Adaptation
>Goal Attainment
>Intigration
>Latent pattern Maintinence
>
>Paradoxically,
>Rob Beeston
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:18:06 -0500
>From: Lena Rotenberg <lenar@hermesnet.net>
>Subject: Re: virus: Brett and Richard,
>
>Too much ado about nothing, methinks.
>
>lena
>- -
>Lena Rotenberg
>lenar@hermesnet.net
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of virus-digest V2 #389
>***************************
>
>