"meaning is identical to effect (except when it isn't)"
Deron
________
David McFadzean wrote:
>So let's say you're right, meaning has nothing to do with causality.
>Where do you think it comes from? Take a specific example. What is
>the nature of the meaning of "cat"? Where does it come from? How does
>it work? Is it the same for everyone? If not, why not? What are the
>mechanisms by which "cat" means something to someone?