List,
Translation seems to imply two (or more) information streams which compress
into one symbol...sort-of a "translator" symbol. If the translator is not a
pattern, then the translation would lose information from one form to the
other. I would also assume that the nature of trannslation is that two (or
more) streams can each be compressed and uncompressed into a pattern without
losing information...translation would be dependent upon compression and
thereby "less fundamental".
Brett
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another
profound truth.
NIELS BOHR