Re: virus: Social Mataphysics

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Fri, 26 Sep 1997 16:20:47 -0700

>I do not accept <reality> as primary. In fact, it seems to be to be a very
>distant
>derivative which we will only arrive at after many, many years of searching.
>I move we start with <perception> which is something we are all doing
>right now.

OK. Perception is a primary concept. How do you suggest to define Reality?

>Are you trying to get somewhere? Tad, you need to log off the computer and
>WALK...oh, sorry...that was a metaphor, huh? Getting somewhere...
>
>I don't think I understand exactly what you mean? Where are we going?

I thought David made it pretty clear when he suggested to start with the
statement "Objective reality is consistent" and see where we agree and where
we disagree. It seemed quite simple to decide if one agrees with it or not.
I was an optimist when I jokingly saw it as a two year project...

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159