At 03:17 PM 9/23/97 +0100, you wrote:
>I though some of you might be interested in this:
>
> "There is no deep reality" represents the prevailing
> doctrine of establishment physics.
>
> [Niels] Bohr [who takes this position] does not deny
> the evidence of his senses. The world we see
> around us is real enough, he affirms, but it floats on
> a world that is not as real.
>
>A couple of quotes, out of order, from Nick Herbert's
>Quantum Reality.
>
>So what does "real enough" mean, and what can we
>make of the assertion that this "real enough" world
>"floats" on one that is not as real?
>
>As regards consistency, BTW, it seems conspicuously
>lacking at the quantum level.
>
>Robin
>
Returning,
rBERTS%n
Rabble Sonnet Retort
First Rule of History:
History doesn't repeat itself -- historians merely repeat
each other.