>Or assuming that the isomophisms we use to understand the consistancy of
>the universe are complete may blind one as well (if not more).
Yeah, maybe. True confession: I also assume other people exist.
That doesn't mean these assumptions are beyond possible revision.
>Possibly. I wonder, are our thoughts considered a part of "objective
>reality" for the purposes of this discussion?
Why wouldn't they be?
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/