> Logic isn't dependent on physical conditions. It holds for this and
> all possible universes (in fact, that is what defines a possible universe).
...in logic, that is.
> >Just because water boils at 33 degrees in a vacuum doesn't mean it will in
> >my kitchen. All such arguments on the list so far have this fatal
> >flaw--they assume just because something is possible it will be prevalent.
> >An un-glamorous error at best.
>
> Either that or we're not talking about the same thing.
As is so often the case, I think that is the root of the problem.
-Prof. Tim