Re: virus: Re: The saga continues!

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Sun, 14 Sep 1997 15:47:03 -0700


Brett wrote:
>Which is to say that we could just vote on the proposed
>question (above) "Democratically" and the person who receives the average
>number of votes (neither the most nor the least) is the winner...as long as
>he/she voted "undecided". This person would be the least subjectively
>objective and therefore the most trustworthy (as long as he/she decidedly
>voted undecided).

Thank you for responding to my question.
Can you give an example of how we are to select a winner?

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159