>Could you please keep your posts a bit shorter? Your points really
>interest me, as you're the first rational representative of Objectivism
>I know. It's just that I practically can't spend the time it takes for a
>full article of yours, and I find myself in depressing situations right
>around the beautiful too-early hours of night-morning.
>I mean, you could get a site and post those articles over there, then
>only link your posts to particular arguments you make there.
>
>This goes for all others on the list as well.
This is incredible. Lior addresses this post to Dave, "the intruder".
I couldn't resist to get some facts from Eudora for the last couple od days.
I found posts with more than 4 Eudora "pages":
Dave Pape: 7, 5, 11, 6, 9, 5, 5, 5, 6, 11, 6, 11, 5
Richard Brodie: 39, 9, 6
Reed: 6, 5
David Rosdeitcher: 6, 8, 7
Tim: 5
zaimoni: 7
Vicki 9, 8
Dan: 10, 5
Richard's 39 pages post was a copy of an existing web article. Lior, I am
curious, if you care to answer: why didn't you say anything about Richard?
(Yes, I know you've added: "This goes for all others on the list as well").
Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159